장바구니 담기 close

장바구니에 상품을 담았습니다.

장바구니로 계속쇼핑하기
헌법재판순명론
미리보기

헌법재판순명론

  • 정주백
  • |
  • 충남대학교출판문화원
  • |
  • 2021-03-15 출간
  • |
  • 341페이지
  • |
  • 152 X 225mm
  • |
  • ISBN 9791165031176
판매가

22,000원

즉시할인가

21,340 원

배송비

2,300원

(제주/도서산간 배송 추가비용:3,000원)

추가상품
상품선택
독서대 7,900원 독서대 선택안함 0원
수량
+ -
총주문금액
21,340원
장바구니 구매하기

※ 스프링제본 상품은 반품/교환/환불이 불가능하므로 신중하게 선택하여 주시기 바랍니다.

북스크린영상으로 만나보는 한 권의 책 이야기

목차

서 문 ··················································13

第1章 지금, 대한민국의 수도는 어디인가? ···················17
- 수도이전 위헌 결정의 역설 -
I. 들어가는 말 ·············································19
II. 국민투표권의 침해 여부에 관한 헌재의 판단 ················20
1. 문제의 소재 ··········································20
2. 국민투표권 침해를 인정한 헌재의 논거 ···················22
III. 검토 ··················································24
1. 이 사건 법률로써 수도가 이전되었나? ····················24
2. 법률로써 헌법이 개정될 수 있는가? ·····················28
3. 이 사건 법률로써 헌법은 과연 개정되었는가? ·············38
4. 이 사건 법률이 위헌으로 결정될 수 있는가? ··············39
5. 이 사건 법률에 대한 위헌결정은 헌법의 효력에 영향을 미칠 수 있는가? ··· 40
IV. 결론 ··················································42
第2章 이른바 양심적 병역거부 관련 헌법재판소 결정에 관한 검토
···················································45
Ⅰ. 서론 ··················································47
Ⅱ. 전제되는 논의 ·········································48
1. 무엇이 병역인가? ·····································48
2. 청구인들의 주장 ······································54
3. 소결론 ···············································57
Ⅲ. 대상성 문제 - 진정입법부작위와 부진정입법부작위의 구별 문제 ·····57
1. 문제의 제기 ··········································57
2. 기준 ·················································58
3. 이 사건의 경우 ·······································62
4. 소결론 ···············································65
Ⅳ. 재판의 전제성 문제 ·····································66
1. 문제의 제기 ··········································66
2. 적용 ·················································66
3. 다른 내용의 재판 ·····································68
4. 소결론 ···············································74
Ⅴ. 결론 ··················································75

第3章 2006헌마328 병역법 사건에 관한 절차법적 검토 ·········77
Ⅰ. 서론 ··················································79
Ⅱ. 사건의 내용 중 절차법에 관련된 부분 ·····················80
1. 사건의 개요와 검토 대상 법률 조항 ······················80
2. 헌재 결정 중 적법성 판단 부분 ·························81
Ⅲ. 연구 ··················································82
1. 기본권 침해 가능성 ····································82
2. 직접성 ···············································88
3. 청구기간 ·············································94
4. 심판청구의 이익 ······································97
5. 기타 ···············································109
Ⅳ. 결론 ·················································111

第4章 재판의 전제성에 관한 관견 ···························113
I. 들어가는 말 ···········································115
II. 적용될 것 ·············································117
1. 사례(헌재 2011. 10. 25. 2010헌바476) ·················117
2. 검토 ···············································118
III. 이유를 달리하는 경우 ··································130
1. 헌재의 결정례 ·······································130
2. 검토 ···············································134
IV. 재판의 내용과 효력에 관한 법적 의미가 달라지는 경우 ·····136
1. 사례 ···············································136
2. 검토 ···············································140
V. 여론 - 표현 자체의 문제 ································146
1. 들어가는 말 ·········································146
2. ‘원칙적으로’ ·········································147
3. ‘원칙’과 ‘예외’의 관계 ································148
4. ‘주문이나 결론이 달라지는 경우’와 ‘재판이 가지는 법적 의미가 달라지는 경우’의 관계 ·································148
5. 기타 ···············································149
VI. 결론 ·················································150

第5章 재판의 전제성 중 ‘재판이 가지는 법적 의미를 달리하는 경우’라는 요건의 필요성 ························································································ 151
I. 서론 ··················································153
II. 사건의 개요와 판단 ····································154
1. 사건의 개요와 심판의 대상 ····························154
2. 헌재의 판시 ·········································155
III. 일반론 ···············································156
1. 논의의 전제 ·········································156
2. 판례의 흐름 ·········································158
3. 92헌가8 사건의 판시 분석 ····························172
IV. 대상결정에 대한 평가와 새로운 입론 ·····················175
1. 평가 ···············································175
2. 입론 ···············································179
V. 결론 ·················································181

第6章 형벌조항에 대한 위헌 결정으로 인한 재심의 범위 ·······183
I. 서론 ··················································185
II. 헌재법 제47조 제3항 단서의 의의 ························186
1. 문제의 제기 ·········································186
2. 헌재법 제47조 제4항의 해석 ···························188
3. 헌재법 제47조 제3항 단서의 재판의 전제성 ··············194
4. 헌재법 제47조 제3항과 제4항의 관계 ···················196
5. 소결론 ··············································204
III. 소급효 제한의 기준 ····································206
1. 도입 ···············································206
2. 대법원의 입장 ·······································207
3. 검토 ···············································207
IV. 법률에 대한 헌재법 제68조 제1항에 의한 헌법소원 ········211
1. 도입 ···············································211
2. 차단효 ··············································212
3. ‘위헌’ 결정? ·········································215
V. 결론 ·················································216

第7章 형사재판 중 적용법령에 대해 헌법소원을 제기하였을 때의 직접성 문제 ········································································································ 219
I. 도입 ··················································221
II. 사건의 개요와 헌재의 판단 ······························222
1. 사건의 개요 ·········································222
2. 헌재의 판단 요지 ····································223
III. 연구 ·················································225
1. 형벌조항으로 인한 기본권 침해의 내용 ··················225
2. 직접성 원칙의 적용 ··································234
IV. 결론 ·················································247

第8章 한국의 위헌심사 ····································249
I. 서론 ··················································251
II. 관할 ·················································252
1. 서론 ···············································252
2. 내용 ···············································252
3. 통계 ···············································256
III. 통치구조 안에서의 위치 ································257
1. 헌재의 성격 ·········································257
2. 구성 ···············································257
3. 국회와의 관계 ·······································258
4. 정부와의 관계 ·······································258
IV. 법원과의 관계 ········································259
1. 서론 ···············································259
2. 수평적 관계 ·········································259
3. 재판소원 문제 ·······································260
4. 명령 · 규칙에 대한 위헌심사 문제 ······················261
5. 변형결정의 문제 ·····································262
V. 위헌 결정의 효력 ······································265
1. 법률의 규정 ·········································265
2. 一般效··············································266
3. 違憲 決定의 時的 效力································266
4. 羈束力··············································267
VI. 미래의 전망 ··········································268
1. 서론 ···············································268
2. 헌법해석의 통일성 보장책 ·····························269
3. 재판소의 구성 ·······································270
4. 관할 ···············································271
V. 결론 ·················································272

第8-1章 韓?の違憲審査制度···························275
I. 序論··················································277
II. 管轄·················································278
1. 序論···············································278
2. ?容···············································283
3. 統計···············································283
III. 統治構造の中における位置付け···························283
1. 憲裁の性格··········································283
2. 構成···············································284
3. ??との?係········································284
4. 政府との?係········································285
IV. 法院との?係·········································286
1. 序論···············································286
2. 水平的?係··········································286
3. 裁判訴願問題········································287
4. 命令ㆍ規則に?する違憲審査問題·······················289
5. ?形決定の問題······································290
V. 違憲決定の?力········································292
1. 法律の規定··········································292
2. 一般?··············································293
3. 違憲決定の時的?力··································293
4. 羈束力··············································295
VI. 未?への展望·········································295
1. 序論···············································295
2. 憲法解?の統一性保障策·······························297
3. 裁判所の構成········································298
4. 管轄···············································299
V. 結論·················································300

第8-2章 ??????制度·····························303
Ⅰ. ??·················································305
Ⅱ. 管?·················································305
1. ??···············································305
2. ?容···············································306
3. ??···············································308
Ⅲ. ?治??中位置·······································308
1. ?裁的性?··········································308
2. ??···············································309
3. ???的?系········································309
4. ?政府的?系········································310
Ⅳ. ?法院的?系·········································310
1. ??···············································310
2. 水平?系············································311
3. 裁判????········································311
4. ?命令、??的??????···························311
5. ?形判?制度的??··································312
V. ??判?的效力········································313
1. 法律?定············································313
2. 效力···············································314
3. ??判?的??效力··································314
4. ?束力··············································315
VI. 未?瞻望·············································315
1. ??···············································315
2. ?法解??一性的保?方法·····························316
3. 裁判所的?成········································317
4. 管?···············································318
V. ??·················································318

第9章 韓?の憲法裁判の現況と展望··························321
1. 憲法裁判の意義········································323
2. 憲法裁判機?の分類····································327
3. 韓?の憲法裁判所······································329
4. ?? - 日本への示唆···································342
5. 結論·················································347
추천포스트

교환 및 환불안내

도서교환 및 환불
  • ㆍ배송기간은 평일 기준 1~3일 정도 소요됩니다.(스프링 분철은 1일 정도 시간이 더 소요됩니다.)
  • ㆍ상품불량 및 오배송등의 이유로 반품하실 경우, 반품배송비는 무료입니다.
  • ㆍ고객님의 변심에 의한 반품,환불,교환시 택배비는 본인 부담입니다.
  • ㆍ상담원과의 상담없이 교환 및 반품으로 반송된 물품은 책임지지 않습니다.
  • ㆍ이미 발송된 상품의 취소 및 반품, 교환요청시 배송비가 발생할 수 있습니다.
  • ㆍ반품신청시 반송된 상품의 수령후 환불처리됩니다.(카드사 사정에 따라 카드취소는 시일이 3~5일이 소요될 수 있습니다.)
  • ㆍ주문하신 상품의 반품,교환은 상품수령일로 부터 7일이내에 신청하실 수 있습니다.
  • ㆍ상품이 훼손된 경우 반품 및 교환,환불이 불가능합니다.
  • ㆍ반품/교환시 고객님 귀책사유로 인해 수거가 지연될 경우에는 반품이 제한될 수 있습니다.
  • ㆍ스프링제본 상품은 교환 및 환불이 불가능 합니다.
  • ㆍ군부대(사서함) 및 해외배송은 불가능합니다.
  • ㆍ오후 3시 이후 상담원과 통화되지 않은 취소건에 대해서는 고객 반품비용이 발생할 수 있습니다.
반품안내
  • 마이페이지 > 나의상담 > 1 : 1 문의하기 게시판 또는 고객센터 1800-7327
교환/반품주소
  • 경기도 파주시 문발로 211 1층 / (주)북채널 / 전화 : 1800-7327
  • 택배안내 : CJ대한통운(1588-1255)
  • 고객님 변심으로 인한 교환 또는 반품시 왕복 배송비 5,000원을 부담하셔야 하며, 제품 불량 또는 오 배송시에는 전액을 당사에서부담 합니다.